TRAVINTO / X2X BI MIGRATOR
Modernize dashboards, enterprise reports, semantic models, and application reporting with a business-led migration plan. Combine deterministic mappings with agentic assistance, then validate metrics, filters, security, and delivery before acceptance.
RETAIL TRADING / SEMANTIC REVIEW
X2X BI MIGRATOR / REPORTING MODERNIZATION
Start from how people use the report, the definitions behind it, and the evidence needed to accept a replacement. Migration routes and target platforms are assessed for the selected estate.
BusinessObjects, Cognos or Oracle BI → a reviewed modern BI design
Assess universes, logical models, report queries, prompts, security, and delivery behavior. Target Power BI, Tableau, Looker, or another platform only after feature and version assessment.
Power BI, Tableau, Qlik and cloud analytics estates
Review semantic dependencies, calculations, interactions, extracts, identity, and refresh. A workbook move and a platform change have different acceptance requirements.
SSRS, Crystal, BI Publisher and embedded reports
Preserve parameters, grouping, page layout requirements, exports, distribution, and access boundaries. Agree redesign where destination behavior differs.
Tabular, multidimensional, universe and workbook models
Define metric ownership, grain, hierarchies, calculation precedence, time intelligence, and security. Consolidate shared definitions before accepting target reports.
BI SOURCE & ARTIFACT CATALOG
Explore BI platforms, legacy components, operational reporting, and native model or report artifacts. Search by name and filter by category to identify the right assessment scope.
100 of 100 sources
No matching BI source. Try a broader name or choose all categories.
The catalog describes source assessment coverage, including products, components, and artifact families. Confirm version compatibility, licensed access, export formats, supported conversion patterns, and target capabilities for each migration.
Approved report, universe, repository, cube, or semantic-model exports; versions, security definitions, and dependencies.
Permitted workbooks, model definitions, report packages, calculations, refresh settings, permissions, and usage context.
Authorized semantic definitions, report specifications, dashboard metadata, SQL, embeds, identity settings, and delivery requirements.
Native artifacts are assessed in their own right. Packaging, extract contents, custom extensions, encryption, and export permissions affect what can be inspected.
Approved reporting definitions, financial hierarchies, templates, query logic, application context, scheduling, and access policies.
PRODUCT FEATURES & DELIVERY SCOPE
Scope the inventory, semantic design, conversion proposals, validation, and release controls together. Product availability, integrations, and supported patterns are confirmed during assessment.
Scope reports, dashboards, datasets, universes, cubes, semantic models, schedules, and subscriptions. Capture ownership, version, usage evidence, and criticality before deciding what to retain.
Trace measures, dimensions, source queries, shared datasets, transformation logic, and downstream consumption. Keep unresolved dynamic queries and application dependencies visible.
Map business entities, relationships, grain, aggregation behavior, hierarchies, and shared definitions to a reviewed target design. A matching field name does not establish equivalent meaning.
Apply approved mappings to supported expressions and prepare agent-assisted alternatives for ambiguous logic. Review DAX, MDX, M, SQL, set analysis, and platform-specific semantics separately.
Assess slicers, prompts, parameters, drill paths, cross-filter behavior, bookmarks, and report context. Test calculations under representative combinations of user selections.
Map authorized roles, row-level or object-level restrictions, workspace permissions, and embedded identities. Validate allowed and denied cases with approved test users.
Assess chart intent, conditional formatting, grouping, pagination, exports, printing, and accessibility. Unsupported visuals and custom extensions require explicit redesign decisions.
Scope gateways, credentials, refresh dependencies, source availability, subscriptions, bursting, and delivery timing. Confirm destination features and operating ownership before rollout.
Identify overlapping measures, repeated datasets, unused assets, and candidates for consolidation. Business owners decide which assets are retired, merged, rebuilt, or migrated.
Prepare expected results by metric, reporting period, filter context, currency, totals, and user role. Document tolerances and investigate differences rather than assuming visual similarity proves parity.
Scope inventory findings, target-model proposals, calculation mappings, report-design decisions, exception registers, and test evidence. Confirm repository and deployment integration for the implementation.
Define pilot users, parallel-run periods, review ownership, training, go/no-go evidence, rollback, and retirement criteria. This website does not run migrations or connect to BI platforms.
Carry metric definitions, filter behavior, identity, and source evidence through each stage. Retire an old report only after its replacement and operating responsibilities are accepted.
TWO APPROACHES / ONE ACCEPTANCE STANDARD
Select the approach by task. Known transformations and policy checks suit explicit rules; incomplete context and complex exceptions may benefit from agent assistance.
RULES & CONTROLLED EXECUTION
CONTEXT & REVIEWABLE PROPOSALS
Visual similarity does not establish metric parity. Converted measures, filter behavior, and access rules require repeatable tests and business sign-off regardless of how they were prepared.
Versioned inputs, identity, scope
Explicit mappings or reviewed proposals
Tests, reconciliation, exception evidence
Accept, revise, reject, or escalate
Use representative cases to establish an acceptance baseline. Record input versions, rule or model configuration, failed checks, reviewer decisions, and recovery requirements.
ACCEPTANCE / BUSINESS & TECHNICAL EVIDENCE
Use a shared semantic specification for measures, grain, calendars, currencies, and access rules. Treat differences as owned exceptions until the appropriate reviewers accept them.
Compare agreed measures, totals, subtotals, nulls, and rounding at the correct grain.
Test selected dates, slicers, prompts, drill paths, and cross-filter interactions.
Check fiscal calendars, effective dates, time zones, conversion rules, and period boundaries.
Test representative identities, permitted rows, denied records, and export access.
Review accessibility, pagination, printing, exports, subscriptions, and refresh dependencies.
Record owners, evidence, exceptions, approved tolerances, parallel-run findings, and release decisions.
X2X BI MIGRATOR / 10 USE CASES
Explore ten scenarios specific to X2X BI Migrator. Explore a case-study card to see the business challenge, deterministic work, agentic assistance, and acceptance evidence to scope for your estate.
01DASHBOARDSIndustryRetail & commerceExample marketUnited StatesEnterprise dashboard platform migrationA business team needs dashboards recreated on a different BI platform with consistent decisions and definitions.Explore case study DELIVERY APPROACH & ACCEPTANCE
02OPERATIONAL REPORTINGIndustryPublic sectorExample marketUnited KingdomPaginated and operational report renewalA report estate depends on printable documents, parameters, grouping, and recurring distribution.Explore case study DELIVERY APPROACH & ACCEPTANCE
03SEMANTIC MODELSIndustryManufacturingExample marketGermanyCube and semantic-model migrationBusiness logic is concentrated in cubes, universes, tabular models, or shared reporting layers.Explore case study DELIVERY APPROACH & ACCEPTANCE
04METRIC CONSISTENCYIndustryProfessional servicesExample marketUnited Arab EmiratesExecutive KPI consolidationLeadership dashboards use conflicting definitions of the same named business measure.Explore case study DELIVERY APPROACH & ACCEPTANCE
05SECURITY PARITYIndustryBanking & financial servicesExample marketSingaporeRole-based reporting migrationA target BI environment must preserve which users can view, export, or share specific information.Explore case study DELIVERY APPROACH & ACCEPTANCE
06FINANCIAL SEMANTICSIndustryInsuranceExample marketIndiaFinancial period and currency reportingReports must preserve fiscal calendars, conversion policies, closing periods, and comparative measures.Explore case study DELIVERY APPROACH & ACCEPTANCE
07APPLICATION ANALYTICSIndustryTelecommunicationsExample marketNetherlandsEmbedded analytics modernizationA customer-facing or internal application embeds reports with contextual filters and application identity.Explore case study DELIVERY APPROACH & ACCEPTANCE
08DELIVERY OPERATIONSIndustryLogisticsExample marketAustraliaRefresh and subscription transitionUsers rely on refresh windows, extracts, gateways, subscriptions, or burst reporting.Explore case study DELIVERY APPROACH & ACCEPTANCE
09SELF-SERVICE GOVERNANCEIndustryEducationExample marketCanadaSpreadsheet-led reporting migrationCritical reporting depends on workbook formulas, pivot logic, manual steps, and undocumented data preparation.Explore case study DELIVERY APPROACH & ACCEPTANCE
10PORTFOLIO REDUCTIONIndustryHealthcareExample marketUnited KingdomReport estate rationalizationA migration program must decide which reports to move, redesign, consolidate, or retire.Explore case study DELIVERY APPROACH & ACCEPTANCE
Industry and example-market labels provide scenario context. They do not identify actual customers or customer locations. These use cases describe requirements and design approaches, not completed customer projects. Source and target compatibility, available features, and implementation scope are confirmed during assessment.
X2X BI MIGRATOR / 10 CASE STUDIES
Industry-led migration scenarios with a clear source, target, inventory, time window, and acceptance focus. Use the arrows, numbered controls, or swipe to browse.
CASE 01Trading reports need consistent revenue, returns, margin, and stock definitions across channels.
CASE 02A reporting renewal must preserve measure grain, reporting dates, and user-specific visibility.
CASE 03Sales reporting depends on shared definitions, prompts, context selection, and reference hierarchies.
CASE 04Operational teams need predictable printable documents and controlled recipient access.
CASE 05Users rely on selection behavior and set expressions that need an explicit target interpretation.
CASE 06Performance reporting needs governed joins, shared measures, time definitions, and access rules.
CASE 07Critical reporting mixes model logic, workbook queries, manual inputs, and undocumented adjustments.
CASE 08Operational dashboards depend on metric levels, dimensional hierarchies, and production-period definitions.
CASE 09Administrative reporting needs continuity of parameters, print output, scheduling, and permitted access.
CASE 10Claims dashboards need agreed definitions, date handling, grouping, and access boundaries after a platform change.
Industries, locations, customer-team profiles, inventory quantities, and time windows are scenario assumptions, not claims about actual clients or completed migrations. Timing follows an estimation baseline of 2 months per 1,000 migration inventory items; item complexity and delivery capacity change the actual schedule. Product compatibility and delivery schedules require assessment.
PRODUCT QUESTIONS
No. Review usage, duplicated reporting, metric ownership, and decision needs before selecting what to retain, consolidate, redesign, or retire. Target features and calculation behavior require separate validation.
Start with a bounded workflow, authorized source examples, platform versions, business rules, and named reviewers. Agree the expected evidence and acceptance criteria before implementation.
Contact Travinto with the source and target landscape, scope, and operating constraints. Availability, integrations, execution capabilities, delivery responsibilities, and commercial terms require confirmation.
It contains 100 named source entries: BI products, legacy product components, application-reporting sources, and native report or model artifact families. These are distinct assessment entries, not a claim of 100 independent vendors or certified automatic converters. Versions, export permissions, source formats, custom extensions, and target routes require confirmation.
BI migration also includes semantic models, calculation behavior, filter context, security, refresh, delivery, accessibility, and business adoption. Some assets can be mapped, some need redesign, and others may be retired after owner review. Data and code modernization can be coordinated as separate workstreams.
No. Screenshots can support a visual review, but acceptance also requires metric, filter, time, currency, security, refresh, and delivery checks using representative cases. Agree expected results and tolerances with business owners.
Provide permitted native exports, platform versions, data-source dependencies, model and calculation definitions, role mappings, delivery requirements, usage information where available, and representative acceptance examples. Packaged workbooks and extracts may contain sensitive data; agree the permitted inspection scope and remove credentials before sharing.
Product scope and availability are confirmed during assessment. This website does not execute migrations, data pipelines, or operational actions.
Compare Travinto products